spacer
Ransom Fellowship
spacer articles movies music books art faith discernment spacer
 
articles
publications
search
people
links
faq
blank
about
contact
press kit
Ransom Blogs
spacer
spacer
current article  
spacer
spacer
spacer
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Hannah Arendt, 1963)<br>
An Ordinary Man (Paul Rusesabagina, 2006) spacer Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Hannah Arendt, 1963)
An Ordinary Man (Paul Rusesabagina, 2006)

BY: Preston Jones
spacer
Ordinary Men
I recently read two books about ordinary men. One of them, Paul Rusesabagina, played a key role in rescuing 1,200 Tutsis and their Hutu friends during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. The other, Adolph Eichmann, played a key role in the mass murder of Jews during the Second World War.


In neither case do we want to believe that these men were ordinary. Normal people, after all, don’t get asked by major publishers to write memoirs, as Rusesabagina did. And the New Yorker doesn’t send reporters overseas to report on the trials of run-of-the-mill criminals. But Rusesabagina tells us several times that he isn’t a special person; he says he did only what he had to do in an unusual moment. If we could talk to his first wife, we might hear something of his faults. And one assumes that the unknowing customers he picked up as a taxi driver in Belgium after the genocide didn’t detect in him anything particularly heroic.


The same is probably true of the Argentine laborers who worked alongside Eichmann through the 1950s, unaware that their workmate, who had fled to South America after the war, had overseen the transportation of Jews to Nazi Germany’s killing centers. The philosopher-journalist Hannah Arendt tells us that Eichmann was nothing more than a boring, banal, thoughtless careerist. In a different place and time, he might have ended up as a middle manager, tending to emails, meetings, and office gossip.


In both cases, the important thing was practice. Rusesabagina had long practice as the manager of the Hotel Milles Collines, a luxurious place for Rwanda’s elite and up-scale visitors. He had risen to his position as a result of hard work, which meant tending to clients’ needs. He became highly skilled at figuring out how to makes people’s stays pleasant. In the process he developed habits. He tells us that when the genocide erupted he had little time to think things through. “Over and over people kept telling me that what I did…was heroic, but I never saw it that way…. I was a hotel manager doing his job.”


But what did it mean to be a successful hotel manager? It meant the cultivation of empathy. It meant the ability to puts another’s momentary desires (I need more towels) ahead of one’s own (I’ve had a long day and want to go home). It meant taking responsibility on one’s own shoulders. During the genocide, Rusesabagina rejected murderous demands from his political superiors because he felt responsible for the people who had fled to his hotel. In his guests’ interests, he employed righteous deception.


Eichmann, on the other hand, never disobeyed orders, and he presented himself as a man of honor because he had always gone along with his superiors’ wishes, even when he personally found them unpleasant. Eichmann had no personal hatred for Jews, but his government called for their murder and he was a government man hustling his way up the career chain—so there you go.


Eichmann was not stupid, Arendt tells us. “It was sheer thoughtlessness—something by no means identical with stupidity—that predisposed him to become one of the greatest criminals of [the war] period.” Eichmann was not demonic, he was shallow. Considering the hollow man before her at the trial in Jerusalem in 1962, Arendt reflected on the “strange interdependence of thoughtlessness and evil.”


The interdependence of thoughtlessness and evil. We can turn that around: the interdependence of thoughtfulness and good.


There is much to say about both of these books, but the discussions my class will have on them will lead to reflection on the nexus between thoughtlessness and evil and thoughtfulness and good. Of course, the Gospels have a lot to say on this theme. “You fool!” God says to a thoughtless landowner. “This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself?” (Luke 12:20)


In a day when keeping student-customers happy is a keen goal, it would be tempting to leave the class conversation at the safe level of philosophical abstraction. But we won’t. Instead we will focus, laser-like, on the fact that Rusesabagina and Eichmann did what they did in the big moments because of what they had made of themselves in the small moments. Eichmann did what he did because, in the decades before, he had made decisions that made him into the kind of person who could do that. The same is true of Rusesabagina.


The same is true of you and me.


People say they would never obey orders that would put innocent people’s lives at risk, but they have no problem with texting behind the wheel. They deceive themselves by saying that they know texting while driving is dangerous, but since they know it’s dangerous they’ll be extra careful and thus, for them, it’s not dangerous! That’s called self-deception, and little good can come from putting energy into lying to ourselves, and then putting more energy into believing the lies we have told. Little good can come from it, but the obesity epidemic, the pervasive and predictable rudeness associated with communications technology, and the appalling violence against women of prime time fare point, at the least, to a society immersed in thoughtlessness. What are the consequences of these trends, and to what will they lead?


People know that big decisions matter and assume that, when the decisions come around, they will get them right. Sometimes, yes; sometimes, no—consult the divorce rate. Rusesabagina and Arendt suggest that success in the big things depends on learning from previous moral mistakes and general success in life’s little demands. They provide us with illustrations of a basic biblical idea: “He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much” (Luke 16:10).


How I drive matters. What I eat matters. What I watch and talk about matters. What I read, or if I do, matters. The level of attention I give to my responsibilities matters. The degree to which I keep my word matters. Everyday things, small decisions matter.


Eichmann was not a monster, Arendt says; he was “a clown.” He had a “horrible gift for consoling himself with clichés.”


A key difference between Eichmann and Rusesabagina was that the latter really understood that his decisions didn’t only affect himself. He was able to imagine how his decisions might affect others. He understood that his private life had public significance. He had been able to enunciate “words directed against the darkness” in a moment of extremity because he had made the habit of doing so in moments of relative ease.


Copyright © 2011 Preston Jones.

image

Questions:
-

Source:
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil by Hannah Arendt (New York, NY: Penguin; 1963) 336 pages.

An Ordinary Man by Paul Rusesabagina (New York, NY: Penguin; 2006) 224 pages.

spacer
spacer
spacer
about the author
spacer
Preston Jones
Preston Jones grew up in San Bernardino, California, and served in the Navy from 1986 to 1990. He worked at psychiatric facilities in California while he earned his bachelor’s and master’s degrees, and went to Canada on a Fulbright Scholarship in 1995. He completed a Ph.D. in history at the University of Ottawa in 1999. He taught at the California State University, Sonoma, from 1997 through the summer of 2000 and at The Cambridge School of Dallas through the spring of 2003. He now teaches history and Latin at John Brown University. Since 1996 he has published over 200 articles in numerous academic and general publications, including the Journal of Church and State, the Catholic Historical Review, Books & Culture, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Dallas Morning News, the National Post (Canada), Touchstone and, of course, Critique. He reads the Bible in French, Welsh, and Latin, and he runs one or two marathons a year. He's married to Anne, and they have two children, Eleri and Elliott.
spacer spacer spacer
other articles from this author
spacer
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Hannah Arendt, 1963)
An Ordinary Man (Paul Rusesabagina, 2006)


The Cross and the Wide World

With Godzilla in the City

spacer
related articles
spacer Politics and Perspective: Possible paths and perils

The Ravens, Considered

Creation Turned Bad

Spring, please come

Vital Questions About Your Life

Do We Worship the Same God? (Miroslav Volf, 2012)

A Gentle Madness

C. S. Lewis: Translator for the Post-Whatever Age

When Creation Cries Out

Experimentation, Failure and Faith

Imagination matters

Slipping into politicization

Faithfulness in a Consumerist Society

Quietly Neglected Texts

The Forbidden Bird

The Church Must Not Consume Its Own

Loneliness

The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism Revisited or Pride Goeth Before a Fall

What to do with liberty?

Hearing amidst the clamor: 4 reflections

spacer
spacer spacer spacer bottom
Ransom Fellowship
Ransom Fellowship
spacer I am writing this on November 5th, the day after the mid-term election. Whether you are pleased by the results or unhappy about them, may I suggest a few things? The election is not the harbinger of either the national turn-around you have hoped for or the beginning of the apocalypse you have long dreaded. Democracy works only when good people compromise for the common good. And civility is essential--listening and speaking with care and kindness--if we are to have a national conversation that does not descend into shrill rhetorical posturing.

We don't concentrate on politics in Ransom because we believe that culture is prior to politics. So we try to think about and reflect on the perennial issues that seem to matter most. We hope you'll find the resources we've posted here helpful in that process. Thanks for visiting.

Denis & Margie Haack
Anita Gorder
spacer
spacer
bottom

Home | Articles | Publications | Search | People | Links | FAQ | Donate | About | Contact | Press

All material © 2000-2014 Ransom Fellowship Ministries
Site design by JaM Multimedia