spacer
Ransom Fellowship
spacer articles movies music books art faith discernment spacer
 
articles
publications
search
people
links
faq
blank
about
contact
press kit
Ransom Blogs
spacer
spacer
current article  
spacer
spacer
spacer
A Serious Man (Coen Brothers, 2009) spacer A Serious Man (Coen Brothers, 2009)
BY: R. Greg Grooms
spacer
Laughing with the Devil: a review of A Serious Man by R. Greg Grooms

The devils laughs because God’s world seems senseless to him; the angel laughs with joy because everything in God’s world has its meaning. [Milan Kundera]

Humor is a funny thing. A comedian tells two jokes; he invests each with all his skill, experience, and timing. One gets a laugh, the other falls flat. Why?

Joel and Ethan Coen have been telling us jokes cinematically for years, and I’ve laughed at them all from Fargo to O Brother, Where art Thou? But their latest attempt—A Serious Man—fell flat with me, and I’ve been wondering why. It’s a typical Coen brothers film with great camera work, crisp editing, and extraordinary casting. All the elements of good humor are there, so why am I not laughing?

In A Serious Man we meet Larry Gopnik, physics professor at a small college in the mid-west in 1967. (With a nod towards Garrison Keillor the Coens once referred to their film as “Jews on the Prairie”.)

Everyone wants something from Larry that he/she has no right to. A student wants a passing grade in physics, which he is willing to pay good money for. His daughter wants a nose job. His son wants pot and rock and roll. One neighbor has laid claim to some of his yard; another wants him to join her for sex and pot. The tenure committee at his college passive-aggressively passes on ominous rumor after rumor about his standing, all the while assuring him that all is well. Worst of all, his wife wants a new man, not a younger, handsomer man, but Sy Ableman, a sort of old, fat Jewish Dr. Phil, who ironically is the only person in the film referred to as “a serious man.”

A Serious Man is loosely based on the book of Job, but instead of three friends, Larry seeks advice from three rabbis: Rabbi Scott offers him a monologue about seeing God in a parking lot; Rabbi Nachtner, a story about a dentist who finds the words “Help me” engraved in Hebrew on the back of a patient’s lower incisors. Rabbi Marshak quotes Jefferson Airplane’s Grace Slick: “When the truth is found to be lies, and all the joy within you dies.”

But Larry doesn’t want somebody to love; he wants somebody to explain to him what “Hashem”—God—is trying to tell him in this, and here’s the joke. You see, as a physics prof, Larry knows that on a quantum level the world doesn’t make sense.

The Uncertainty Principle. It proves we can’t ever really know… what’s going on, so it shouldn’t bother you not being able to figure anything out. Although you will be responsible for this on the mid-term.

So why insist religiously, philosophically that it should? That’s the Coen’s joke, and well-told as it is, I still find it hard to laugh with them, and I think I know why.

A century ago, the bane of G.K. Chesterton’s existence were slipshod typesetters who inadvertently turned the word “cosmic” in his essays into “comic”. Eventually he came to see the humor in the error.

Whatever is cosmic is comic… Unless a thing is dignified, it cannot be undignified. Why is it funny that a man should sit down suddenly in the street? There is only one possible or intelligent reason: that man is the image of God. It is not funny that anything else should fall down; only that a man should fall down. No one sees anything funny in a tree falling down. No one sees a delicate absurdity in a stone falling down. No man stops in the road and roars with laughter at the sight of the snow coming down. The fall of thunderbolts is treated with some gravity. The fall of roofs and high buildings is taken seriously. It is only when a man tumbles down that we laugh. Why do we laugh? Because it is a grave religious matter: it is the Fall of Man. Only man can be absurd: for only man can be dignified.

Larry Gopnik is the most existentially feckless character since Hamlet. He gives in where he should stand up, smiles where he should scream. Stripped of any shred of dignity, he just isn’t very funny. Feel free to laugh at him, if you wish, but remember if you do, the joke is on you.


Copyright © 2010 R. Greg Grooms

image

Questions:
1. What were you thinking about as the film ended?

2. Did you like the vignette about the dybbuk at the beginning of the film? How does it relate to the rest of the film? 3. Describe Larry Gopnik. Did you like his character? Do you think you were supposed to like his character? How is the fact that he is a physics professor significant? Discuss the meaning of his quote at the end of the review.

4. What’s the significance of the film’s title, A Serious Man?

5. Larry’s tragedies inspire a question in him: What is “Hashem” (God) trying to tell me?

6. What are the answers the three rabbis—Scott, Nachtner, and Marshak—give him?

7. If Larry came to you with the same question, how would you answer him?

8. The Scriptures teach “… we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose” (Romans 8:28). And yet often, especially in the face of tragedy, life can seem pointless and absurd. How do you respond under such circumstances and why? How should you respond?

9. If you have seen M. Night Shyamalan’s 2002 film Signs, contrast it with A Serious Man. Which film did you prefer? Why?

10. Did you think A Serious Man was funny? Do you think the Coen brothers intended their audience to laugh? How did you respond to Grooms’ criticism that the film, though well done, just isn’t funny?

11. One film reviewer had this to say about A Serious Man: “The Coens seem to be working from a definitive stance that religion and God lead to nothing but confusion and fear. Their God, if they have one, is the cinema. And more often than not, their films speak to lovers of film more than lovers of life. But there's something about that love of film that also embraces the human experience with a striking honesty.” Discuss this quote.

12. The film ends with Larry bending to the pressure of his troubles by doing something he knows to be wrong. What’s the significance of this act? How do the Coens respond to it in the film?



Source:
Starring:
Michael Stuhlbarg (Prof. Lawrence ‘Larry’ Gopnik)
Richard Kind (Uncle Arthur)
Fred Melamed (Sy Ableman)
Sari Lennick (Judith Gopnik)
Aaron Wolff (Danny Gopnik)
Jessica McManus (Sarah Gopnik)
Peter Breitmayer (Mr. Brandt)
David Kang (Clive Park)

Directors: Ethan Coen & Joel Coen
Writers: Ethan Coen & Joel Coen
Producers: Tim Bevan, Ethan Coen, Joel Coen, Eric Fellner, Robert Graf
Original Music: Carter Burwell
Cinematographer: Roger Deakins
Runtime: 106 min
Release: USA; 2009
Rated R (for language, some sexuality/nudity and brief violence)

spacer
spacer
spacer
about the author
spacer
R. Greg Grooms
Greg Grooms and his wife Mary Jane direct the Probe Center, a Christian study center serving students and faculty at the University of Texas at Austin. The Probe Center offers resources, teaching, and hospitality in a program designed to equip students to better understand and engage their culture. Greg is a graduate of Tulane University and for many years was a member of L’Abri Fellowship in Switzerland and the United States. His hobbies include hunting, fishing, directing choral music, and watching films. His intellectual interests include apologetics and the history and philosophy of science.
spacer spacer spacer
other articles from this author
spacer
How to Stay Christian in College (J. Budziszewski, 1999)

Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong (Jonathan Wells, 2000)

Crash (Paul Haggis, 2004)

spacer
related articles
spacer Searching for Sugar Man (Malik Bendjelloul, 2012)

Snow White and The Huntsman (Rupert Sanders, 2012)

Departures (Yôjirô Takita, 2008)

The Hunger Games (Gary Ross, 2012)

The Mill and the Cross (Lech Majewski, 2011)

The Sunset Limited (Tommy Lee Jones, 2012)

Midnight in Paris (Woody Allen, 2011)

Friends With Benefits (Will Gluck, 2011)

The Conspirator (Robert Redford, 2010)

True Grit (Coen Brothers, 2011)

The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2011)

The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2011)

The Social Network (David Fincher, 2010)

127 Hours (Danny Boyle, 2010)

The King's Speech (Tom Hooper, 2010)

Winter's Bone (Debra Granik, 2010)

Away From Her (Sarah Polley, 2006)

Lost Sparrow (Chris Billing, 2009)

Get Low (Aaron Schneider, 2009)

Inception (Christopher Nolan, 2010)

spacer
spacer spacer spacer bottom
Ransom Fellowship
Ransom Fellowship
spacer There are tulips on my desk, and I saw my first robin yesterday, clear signals that winter is losing its grip on the landscape. The newspaper reported an ice jam on a nearby river that forced the closure of several roads. Chunks of ice the size of dinner tables slammed through a county park. Even something as glorious of the arrival of spring is never as perfectly smooth as we would hope in this broken world. We are, as my spiritual mentor used to say, glorious ruins.

Finding what it means to flourish as broken human being in an imperfect world is what Ransom is about. We believe in Jesus Christ, though often find ourselves dismayed at what passes for Christianity in our postmodern world. We hope what you find on this site will be helpful in your own pilgrimage, regardless of where you happen to find yourself at the moment.

Denis & Margie Haack
Anita Gorder

spacer
spacer
bottom

Home | Articles | Publications | Search | People | Links | FAQ | Donate | About | Contact | Press

All material © 2000-2013 Ransom Fellowship Ministries
Site design by JaM Multimedia