Ransom Fellowship
spacer articles movies music books art faith discernment spacer
press kit
Ransom Blogs
current article  
Can We Vote Christianly?: Discernment Exercise spacer Can We Vote Christianly?: Discernment Exercise
BY: Denis Haack
Unless you really like politics, it’s rather hard, sometimes—let’s be honest—to get very enthusiastic about most elections. The constant barrage of commercials, the phone calls at dinner time purporting to be surveys which obviously aren’t, the endless polling and predictions—all of it can make the entire process seem rather tawdry. More importantly, some of us find that none of the candidates accurately mirror our concerns, values, and convictions. Wouldn’t it be nice if ballots included a third option?:

But since that option isn’t open to us, some of us may consider abstaining—at least from some races—and hope that none of our political-activist friends asks whether we fulfilled our duty as citizens.

So, how should we vote when none of the candidates really represent our beliefs and positions? When we agree with one candidate on several important matters and with their opponent on several others?

One solution to that dilemma (for Roman Catholics voters, anyway) is proposed by Catholic Answers. In their “Voters Guide” they say that on most issues our political leaders are simply involved in “selecting the most effective strategy among several morally good options.” The choice involved isn’t between good and evil, but between which practical approach will best solve the issue being addressed. Good people will disagree over such things, and since good and evil are not at stake, political compromise is valid. On the other hand, they insist, there are five issues which are far more foundational, “non-negotiable moral principles that do not admit of exception or compromise.” Here the choice is between right and wrong. The five issues Catholic Answers lists are abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning, and homosexual marriage. Voters, the Guide instructs,

“should avoid to the greatest extent possible voting for candidates who endorse or promote intrinsically evil policies. As far as possible, you should vote for those who promote policies in line with the moral law... Do not vote for candidates who are right on lesser issues but who will vote wrongly on key moral issues... Where ever a candidate endorses positions contrary to non-negotiable principles, choose the candidate likely to do the least harm. If several are equal, evaluate them based on their views on other, lesser issues.”

All of which raises questions that discerning Christians would be wise to consider.


1. Have you ever used a Voters Guide prepared by some organization? Which one? How helpful did you find it? What are the strengths of such Voters Guides? What are the weaknesses?

2. How do you tend to choose which candidate to vote for? How certain are you that your approach represents Christian faithfulness? If you do not vote, why don’t you?

3. What is your response to Catholic Answers’ distinction between “non-negotiable moral principles” and all other issues? Why?

4. To what extent do you agree with their list of “non-negotiable moral principles?”

5. If as Scripture says, “the earth is the Lord’s” (Psalm 24:1), and if part of the reason for Israel’s exile in the Old Testament was their failure to care for the land (2 Chronicles 36:21), is it not essential to include caring for the creation in our list of “non-negotiable moral principles” as Christians?

6. Is it ever possible that during certain periods or for certain offices a candidate’s view of such foundational moral principles is relatively unimportant because they will not face decisions based on them? In that case, might it be more faithful to vote for someone who is correct in other areas, even though they hold moral positions which are contrary to Christian righteousness?

7. To what extent does Christian faithfulness imply that believers will vote for the same candidates? Can equally discerning and godly Christians cast opposite votes? Why or why not?

8. Since we live in a post-Christian and increasingly pluralistic culture, is it possible that the day will arrive when the most Christian choice, the most radically faithful approach will be to refrain from voting? If not, why do you imagine that there will always be candidates which reflect biblical morality? If yes, how will we know that day has arrived?

9. Martin Luther is reported to have said, “Better be ruled by a smart Turk than a dumb Christian.” (Note: Luther was using “Turk” as meaning “Moslem.”) Do you agree? Why or why not? Under what circumstances would you vote for a non-Christian instead of for their Christian opponent?

10. To what extent is the personal faith of a candidate crucial in choosing who you will vote for? Personal character and morality? In some Western European countries, sexual infidelity is not considered a factor in determining whether someone is fit for political office. If you think personal character or morality is important in choosing a candidate, how would you vote if both candidates engaged in sexual practices you believe immoral? Where would these considerations fit in your list of “non-negotiable moral principles?”

11. How do you educate yourself politically? Is it sufficient for faithfulness? What books have you read which explore political citizenship from the perspective of Christian faith? What news and political commentary do you expose yourself to: that with which you already agree, or thoughtful presentations of opposing positions? Why?

about the author
Denis Haack
Denis is the author of The Rest of Success: What the World Didn’t Tell You About Having It All and has written articles for such journals as Reformation & Revival Journal, Eternity, Covenant, and World. He holds a Master of Arts in Theological Studies degree from Covenant Seminary in St. Louis.
spacer spacer spacer
other articles from this author
The J. I. Packer Collection (Alister McGrath, 1999)

John Stott: A Comprehensive Bibliography (Timothy Dudley-Smith, 1995)

John Stott: A Global Ministry (Timothy Dudley-Smith, 2001)

related articles
spacer Discernment 101c: Liking it or Getting it

Flourishing with technology: Discernment Exercise

Discernment 101b: What’s obvious might not be

A Toolkit for Conversations: Discernment Exercise

Discernment 101a: Always begin objectively

Responding to a Changing World: Discernment Exercise

Nudity in Art: Discernment Exercise

The School of Life: Discernment Exercise

Internalizing the Scriptures: Discernment Exercise

God, Jehovah, and Allah: Discernment Exercise

Loving People: Discernment Exercise

Should Christians Wear This Sh**t?: Discernment Exercise

Postville II: Discernment Exercise

Shoulds, Wants, and Faithfulness: Discernment Exercise

Engaging the Arts: Are You A Patron?: Discernment Exercise

Concern for children at play and work: Discernment Exercise

Halloween- Magic and Monsters: Discernment Exercise

Does Sprituality Mean Inner Peace?: Discernment Exercise

Pottering About Potter: Discernment Exercise

Should We Pray? Or Protest?: Discernment Exercise

spacer spacer spacer bottom
Ransom Fellowship
Ransom Fellowship
spacer This web site is old and creaky. The email function functions poorly when it functions at all. Worse, it all looks old. So we are starting work on building a new site, and hope to have it functioning by fall.

Our vision will not change, nor will our attempt in this little spot of the Internet to invite you to join us in thinking about the things that matter most. Thanks for visiting.

Denis & Margie Haack
Anita Gorder

Home | Articles | Publications | Search | People | Links | FAQ | Donate | About | Contact | Press

All material © 2000-2017 Ransom Fellowship Ministries
Site design by JaM Multimedia